Saturday, January 2, 2016

BUSTED!!!!! Bristol Palin's second fatherless child was born in early November, not on Christmas Eve


As we all know, Sarah Palin's 24-yr-old daughter Bristol recently gave birth to her second out-of-wedlock child.  Bristol announced the pregnancy in May 2015 along with the statement that she would not identify the father.

In March 2015, Sarah gleefully announced the engagement between Bristol and former Marine and Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer.  The "engagement" was, without a doubt, the strangest on record.  Why?  Because -- the Palin's are publicity hounds -- Bristol is forever posting personal photos on her Instagram page.  However, after the engagement announcement, we saw not one photo or one mention of:  Bristol picking out a wedding dress; bridal showers; wedding arrangements; none of the usual pre-wedding stuff appeared on any of the Palin family's online pages.

Then, in May, a few weeks before the wedding, Bristol and Sarah announced the wedding was called off.  Speculation as to the reason was rampant but centered on two facts:
  1. Word emerged that Dakota Meyer had been married before -- a surprise to the Palin's.
  2. Bristol announced she was knocked up -- again -- and she refused to name the father.
Now -- follow this closely.

On Bristol's Instagram page are two very telling photos, both taken in Las Vegas on/before Valentine's Day -- 14 February 2015.
  1. In the first photo, we see Bristol, the Palin family, and Bristol's best friend, Marina Lupas  ( who is a well-known Anchorage prostitute, the "Exotic Russian").  The whole crowd is in the lobby of a Vegas Italian restaurant.
  2. The second photo is a selfie taken by Bristol or Marina in the ladies' room of a Vegas casino/restaurant/hotel/whatever.  In the caption accompanying the photo, Bristol says:  "Reminder of the good old days.  The night before I ruined my life forever.  Worst Valentine's Day ever."
  3. In both photos Bristol and Marina are dressed in the same very short black dresses, tops cut down to here, clearly ready to go out and party in Vegas.
Everyone who has analyzed these photos understands what happened: Bristol and Marina went out on the town in Vegas; picked up one or more Vegas lounge lizards; wound up in a hotel room engaging in sex; and, Bristol came out of the night pregnant by a guy she picked up in a bar and whom she does not know.

Normal human gestation is 36 to 40 weeks.  Thus, if Bristol were knocked up on 14 February, her baby would be due between 9 and 21 November.  Her engagement to Dakota was not announced until March, at which time she already was one month pregnant.  Sarah sought the "engagement" to make the baby legitimate, as well as hooking her faded star to a real hero who, she hoped, would help invigorate her many failed ventures.

HOWEVER -- Sarah knew if the public learned that Bristol was knocked up as the result of a one-night stand in Vegas, her hopes of stardom and relevance would come to naught.  Thus, Sarah and Bristol hatched a plot:  Bristol would advertise her pregnancy, complete with photos at 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months -- BUT -- she would post these photos to her Instagram page two months AFTER they were taken.  Thus, when Bristol posted a photo of herself at 5, 6, 7, . . . . months, she was , in fact, 7, 8, and 9 months along -- she posted her 5-month photo two months late, etc., etc..  In late November when Bristol posted a photo claiming her baby was due in 3 weeks -- Christmas Eve -- the baby had already been born.

The Palin family continued this subterfuge but their proclivity to post photos caught them.  Sarah posted onto her Facebook page a photo of herself and Todd holding the newborn one day after the baby was "born"  -- 24 December.  BUT -- the photo was stamped "New Orleans!"  If they were in New Orleans, how were they in Alaska cradling their newborn granddaughter????  They WERE NOT.  In fact, the photo of Sarah, Todd, and baby Sailor was made shortly after the baby was born on 4 November -- they simply did not post the photo publicly until the day after Bristol claimed the baby was born.

Why would they do this??  Simple -- they wanted to make it appear the baby was Dakota Meyer's child.  If the baby were born in late December, that would place conception AFTER the Bristol-Dakota engagement, thereby making it appear that either:
  1.  Bristol and Dakota engaged in a little pre-marital sex, resulting in her becoming pregnant; or,
  2. The baby was conceived after the May marriage and arrived a bit prematurely.
  IN FACT, the child was conceived as described above -- during a Bristol and Marina group sex session on/about Valentine's Day 2015 in Las Vegas.

Now we have proof of the birthdate:  4 NOVEMBER 2105.  Check out the following photos.


First, check out the photo below.  This is the picture that was posted on Bristol's Instagram page on 24 December, claiming the baby was born on 23 December.  Look at the IV inserted into the top of  Bristol's hand.  Just below the green oval in the center of her hand is a piece of transparent tape with writing on it.  Standard IV protocols nationwide require that, when an IV is inserted, a piece of tape or other marking method be affixed next to the IV with the date and time the IV was started written on the tape.  That's what is written on the tape.



Now -- look at the photos below.  These are the photo above subjected to enlarging and enhancing using Photoshop.  Note the image on the right where the date the IV was inserted is clearly 11-4-15:  4 November 2015 -- NOT 23 December 2015.  The baby was born on 4 November 2015.  Bristol simply waited until 24 December to post the photos.



The photo below is the one that's now appearing on Sarah Palin's Facebook page -- note the date of the IV has been whited out.


And there you have it, folks -- the Sarah Palin-Bristol Palin new baby scam is busted!!!!!

Follow this link to a very detailed description of this latest Palin Family fraud.



21 comments:

  1. You still didn't figure-in that February 2015 Nail Salon champagne photo:

    Bristol and Marina in pedicure chairs, lifting glasses of champagne high. In the comments on February 11, 2015, Bristol's very recent, VERY long-term boyfriend (2+ years) Joey Junker scolds her: "So much for not drinking!!!"

    http://i.imgur.com/DvteI6l.jpg

    Why do women stop drinking? Sobriety... and pregnancy.

    With a Delivery Date of November 4th, Bristol could have become pregnant in mid January 2015 - so she'd have KNOWN by early February something was happening, long before bedding Dakota Meyer.

    And so, she peed on a stick and shared THAT information with the Baby Daddy. Why else would JOEY JUNKER scold her for a glass of champagne, to which she replies "I didn't have a sip".

    Got that? "I didn't have a sip". Not a sip. Not even. Who is THAT CAREFUL that they won't take a sip? A pregnant woman. It is MY BELIEF that the "Reminder of the good old days. The night before I ruined my life forever. Worst Valentine's Day ever." was agreeing with mama Sarah to trap Dakota Meyer into marriage via her pregnancy.

    Hence, the whirlwind courtship and engagement. She needed a man, a ring and a marriage certificate, STAT before she started to show! What better way for mama to further HER career than to have a Medial of Honor son-in-law? What better way to legetimize Bristol's pregnancy?

    Neither of them could have possibly guessed that the blogs would unleash an investigation like they did, and what they'd find. So, its IMPERATIVE that she delay that "delivery date" as long as possible, to IMPLY that Dakota Meyer has fathered her child.

    It explains WHY Dakota threw her out of his house so fast that she had to go back and pick up her possessions. She was trying to trap him with a pregnancy that wasn't his. To me, this is much more logical.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And honestly: who does this baby look more like? Dakota - or Joey Junker?

      https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3010/8400/original.jpg

      Delete
  2. I swear people on the internet writing trash like this are the dumbest of the dumb. Literally nothing in this post is remotely proven or factual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Circumstantial evidence in the case of the Palin Mafia is enough to prove they are pathological liars and frauds.

      There's more than enough in this latest Palin fake-birth-date fraud.

      Delete
    2. WOW - you opened this brand-spanking-new, shiny, fresh Blogger account just to post to this thread. Somebody feels very threatened!

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. Awe, Poor Katie must be Palin whore's friend and wants her to save face. Looks legit to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sarah, is that you? Typical garbled syntax. From what you said, you're suggesting Bristol Palin is the "Palin whore", and Katie is her friend. That's highly unlikely!

      And the only person trying to help the "Palin whore" save face is a batshit crazy Bristol Palin fangirl from Florida who stalks every weblog that mention's Bristol's name. Poor Alicia...

      Delete
  4. There are comments on a December 8 IM blog post from someone who is supposedly an extended family member spilling the beans about Bristol and all her babies. If you go down the comments far enough the commenter says at one point:

    "Well shit 501 anon you are right. I went and got the gaudy ass baby shower invite from when Tristan was born (or about to be born) and you are totally right. I would have sworn it was dec11/jan12 when all that chaos was going on.
    I'm giving myself a pass because for all of my teen years and now adult life Bristol has either been pg, having a pg scare, or introducing the new love of her life.
    And screw who ever called me a bull shitter, here is a special fuck you~~~ Sailor has a big flat spot on her head and a big white pimple looking thing on her lip. (It's supposed to be from sucking her fist or some shit) any way when you see these things in photos, you think of me and my "bull shit"."

    When you look at the baby photo with Tripp on this FB page, https://www.facebook.com/lacroixphotography/?fref=nf, Tripp has his hand placed strategically on the baby's head and the next pic down of the baby you can see the flat spot on her head that has been fuzzied up a bit to not look so flat.

    To get to the many posts made by this person, you need to “load more” several times to see all the posts. There are very many attempts to discredit and impersonate the person who is spilling the beans but the message gets through. If you do a search on the word “squalling” you will get to the first one and you have to read further down to see the rest. Some of the information is very enlightening.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, in multiple photos you can see the large swelling on the baby's lower lip. This was described weeks ago by a rogue (!) Palin relative who revealed that the baby was actually born in early November.

      That same relative noted that Bristol had purchased a Ralph Lauren pink+cream striped outfit for the infant and when we saw that, we'd know the intel was true. A photo of the baby in a pink+cream striped outfit was posted by Granny herself on Monday: https://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin/photos/pcb.10153856671813588/10153856669313588/?type=3

      So, yet another Palin baby hoax. Hard to believe...unless you've been paying close attention to that family's many lies over the years.

      Delete
  5. How is that set of 3 images (progressively more enhanced) from the large photo above it? Her hand isn't even in the same position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, it's not. That should have been so obvious it shouldn't have been even necessary to comment on it.

      The set of 3 images is taken directly from the picture posted by Dakota Meyer on his Instagram account. https://www.instagram.com/p/_sGkBHHXGT/?taken-by=dakotameyer0317

      Other similar pictures on Bristol's blog or Sarah Palin's Facebook page have been altered to blur out the date on Bristol's IV label.

      Delete
    2. The post does indicate the enhanced images are from the photo posted here...

      "Now -- look at the photos below. These are the photo above subjected to enlarging and enhancing using Photoshop."

      Thank you for indicating the actual source.

      Delete
  6. How is that set of 3 images (progressively more enhanced) from the large photo above it? Her hand isn't even in the same position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I noticed that too -- two different photos. Something smells.

      Delete
  7. Anyone notice that the Bristol tweet photo shows the IV in her right hand, but the Palin response photo, the IV is in the left hand?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey RightWingCrooks, what's wrong with you? The "proof" photo Palin posted obviously shows a blow-up of a different photo, but why has no-one blown up the one with Bristol and Sarah? The IV tape is right there. Why haven't we had an enhancement of that? Or did you already do that, and it showed a December date as well?

      Delete
  8. Don't Christmas babies usually get little Santa hats?

    ReplyDelete